Death of a Tyrant

No one should be surprised by Saddam's execution. His fate was sealed on 11 September 2001. His so called "trial" was just for show.


From the moment Saddam was caught the Americans the quisling Iraqi government had been saying that he would be tried by the Iraqis for the crimes he committed against Iraqis. But everyone else knew that this was merely a show trial with the Americans orchestrating the whole thing.

The Americans chose which crimes he would be tried for. Saddam was responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands of Iranians, Arabs, Kurds, Sunni and Shias. Yet he was only tried for the murder of 148 Shia in Dujail. Why? Because this was the only crime in which he wasn't aided and abetted by the Americans. Had he been tried for ALL his crimes then the whole world would have realised that it was American weapons and American intelligence that helped Saddam commit those crimes against humanity.


The Americans chose the judges and the lawyers (both prosecution and defence).

During the trial Saddam was detained by the Americans not the Iraqis. This ensured that they could control contact he had and more importantly they could learn what evidence he might use during the "trial"

The CIA controlled the TV pictures of the "trial" so that the nothing that would damage the Americans would get out.

And finally it was the Americans who chose which day he would be executed. No self respecting Muslim would sanction the execution to take place on the holiest day in Islam.

No one should doubt that Saddam was a psychopath who murdered hundreds of thousands and terrorised millions. But he should have faced proper justice for ALL his crimes. His show trial and now his premature execution have ensured that this will now never happen.

The neo-cons may hope that his execution will end the insurgency in Iraq. It will do no such thing. All it has done is denied justice to all but 148 of his victims and put one more nail in the coffin of the notion that the quisling Iraqi government is sovereign and independent of the occupying Americans

Let the World Rejoice: PINOCHET IS DEAD!

Pinochet, the former murderous dictator of Chile, is dead.

In 1973 Pinochet, with the assistance of the CIA, staged a coup and overthrew the democratically elected government and murdered President Allende.

In the following fifteen years anyone who opposed him was dealt with brutally. Thousands were murdered. Tens of thousands were tortured. Hundreds of thousands were imprisoned for years without trial or simply “disappeared”. All of this happened with the explicit support of the “democratic world”.

Pinochet’s apologists argue that he saved Chile from going the way of Cuba and that he brought economic stability. If the people of Chile wanted to go the way of Cuba, let them. It was their right. It was not for Pinochet or the Chilean army’s to deny them their democratic will.

It was only the middle class who benefited from the “economic liberalisation” initiated by Pinochet. Most Chileans lived in abject poverty. Millions lost their jobs.

His apologists also argue that, by South American standards, Dictator Pinochet was a pussy cat. He only murdered three thousand people. Dare I say that this death toll is more than the death toll from the worst catastrophe in history, ever: 9/11.

As well as terrorising the Chilean people, Pinochet plundered the country’s wealth. The income from Chile’s vast mineral resources went into private Swiss bank accounts belonging to Pinochet, his family and his cronies. And there they still are.

There have been a number of attempts to bring Pinochet to justice since he gave up power in 1988 but he has evaded each of them. On a number of occasions he used his cronies, at home and abroad, to pull strings to get him off the hook. Sometimes he used the veil threat of another army coup to keep justice at bay. But most of the times he would just pretend to be ill and yet somehow when he was back home in Chile surrounded by his apologists he would make a miraculous recovery. And now by dying he has evaded justice one final time.

Fifty Years of Defiance

Fifty years ago today began the liberation of Cuba from the vile, corrupt, murderous US sponsored dictatorship of Batista. It would be another two years before Batista was finally overthrown and his cronies, who had profiteered under his regime, would flee to Miami to form one of the biggest and most ruthless organised crime syndicates in the world.

Ever since then Cuba, often alone, has stood steadfast against American tyranny in Latin America. And ever since then the Miami Cuban mafia, aided and abetted by the CIA, have been trying everything possible to regain their stranglehold on Cuba.

First of all came the failed invasion at the Bay of Pigs. When President Kennedy refused to offer further help to the Miami Cuban mafia they murdered him. The Miami Cuban mafia have tried countless times to Castro but each time they were foiled.

Castro will not be around forever but a free Cuba will. And may those who oppose a free Cuba rot in the swamps of Florida.

Stop the Dirty Digger

Rupert's played a blinder.

All the morons in the papers and TV are getting their knickers in a twist because Murdoch has bought a minority share in ITV. They think this is a prelude to him taking over ITV. What they fail to realise is that even the lax British media ownership laws prevent Murdoch from owning ITV outright.

This brilliant move is not about Murdoch taking over ITV. This simple, but masterful, move is merely about preventing any his rivals from taking over ITV and challenging his dominance of the British media. As a minority shareholder Murdoch will be able to veto anyone buying ITV outright.

Murdoch has not become by one of the world's leading, if not the leading, media moguls by providing superior products or services. He has done this by eliminating any competition, by fair or foul means.

In 1990 he forced British Satellite Broadcasting to "merge" with his Sky TV creating what we now know as BSkyB. This gave him a monopoly on satellite TV and a virtual monopoly on pay TV in Britain.

In 2002 he forced ITV Digital into bankruptcy using both legal and illegal methods. He prevented the ITV Sports channel, on whose success the future of ITV Digital rested, from broadcasting on his Sky Digital platform. This denied ITV Sports the millions of subscribers it needed in order to pay for the Football League TV rights. He also used his contacts in the criminal world to crack ITV Digital's encryption technology. By eliminating ITV Digital Murdoch had rid himself of a serious competitor in the pay TV market.

Then, by conspiring with the BBC to create Freeview, the successor to ITV Digital, he ensured that there would never again be any serious pay TV on terrestrial TV.

And now, by buying this minority stake in ITV, he has ensured that NTL-Telewest-Virgin-ITV isn't a threat to BSkyB.

Richard Branson has rightly complained to Ofcom but don't expect those gutless wonders to do anything. They will probably pass the buck to the government. It's time to call in the favours Rupert...

The Revolution That Wasn't

There have been many colourful words used to describe what has happened across the big pond: seismic, extraordinary, political coup. But all of this is giving the American electorate too much credit.

They didn't vote for the Democrats because the neo-cons used a pack of lies to justify the illegal invasion of Iraq. They didn't vote for the Democrats because over one hundred thousand Iraqis have been killed. They didn't vote for the Democrats because over one million Iraqis have been maimed, raped and tortured by the American occupiers and their puppets. They didn't vote for the Democrats because the lives of all Iraqis, except those of the collaborators hiding in the Green Zone, have got worse since Saddam was toppled. They didn't vote for the Democrats because billions of dollars of Iraqi oil money / international aid / American tax payers money have been stolen by the quisling Iraqi government and the various American contractors.

They voted for the Democrats because a few thousand American soldiers have died.

It is also giving the Democratic politicians too much credit. Virtually every Democrat voted for the invasion of Iraq. Most of the new Democrats elected on Tuesday are conservatives who simply don't like seeing American boys coming home in coffins. The Democrats are just Republicans with a different coat on.

Rumsfeld has quit / been sacked. Hooray? No. It's six years too late. He has done his damage. His departure won't bring back the thousands who have died as a result of his lies. It won't heal the scars of American terror that he unleashed on the innocent people of Iraq.

Irrespective of who runs Congress it is Bush who still holds most of the powers in Washington, including foreign policy. This was not a revolution. Expect more of the same.

Truth, Justice - the American Way

Saddam has been found guilty of killing 148 Shia in Dujail. No surprise.

He has been sentenced to death. No surprise.

The verdict came two days before a crucial mid-term election in the USA. No surprise.

The neo-cons and their puppet Iraqi government may hail this verdict as huge blow for the new Iraq but everyone else knows that this was a sham trial which, like the whole Iraq adventure, ended in a farce.

Saddam was responsible for murdering over one million Iranians, Kurds and Shia. So why was he tried just for the 148 killings in Dujail? If Saddam had been tried for all his crimes against humanity the truth about who armed him would have been revealed. In the 1980's the Americans supplied Saddam with most of the weapons which he carried out these crimes because back then he was waging a brutal war against another one their enemies: Iran. Many senior figures in the current neo-con regime are equally culpable for the crimes committed by Saddam. If there was real justice for Saddam's many victims the likes of Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and George Bush Sr would all be swinging from the gallows alongside Saddam.


Previous war crimes/crimes against humanity trials have been held before a special international court. The Nazis were tried by an international court at Nuremburg and the Serb/Croat war criminals are being tried at the Hague. So why wasn't Saddam tried before an international court? An international court would have revealed America's culpability. And it would not have been able the pass the death penalty. By having the trial in Iraq the neo-cons could control the outcome. The various judges, prosecution and defence lawyers were all appointed by the quisling Iraqi government whose strings are pulled from Washington. If any of the judges tried to hold a fair trial they could be removed. If the defence lawyers showed any independence they could be murdered by the collaborators in the new Iraq army. The CIA could control the television coverage of the trial so that the world, and more importantly the Iraqis, only saw and heard what the neo-cons wanted them to.

The neo-cons are dancing in the streets of Washington now that Saddam has been sentenced to death. The EU has called for the execution to be not carried out but Tony Bliar, who apparently is against capital punishment, can't bring himself to say that Saddam shouldn't be executed.

The neo-cons may think that they can wash away their sins with Saddam's blood but the only thing the execution will bring is more bloodshed and heartache for the long suffering people of Iraq. The neo-cons won't be satisfied until the Euphrates and Tigris are running red with the blood of Iraqis.

Saddam Hussein is a genocidal psychopath who destroyed the lives the millions. He should be bought to justice for all his crimes. This sham trial has deprived most of his victims that justice. And the justice for his Dujail victims has been tainted by the political interfering and the farcical way the trial was held. Saddam's execution will mean that he will never be bought to justice.

Killer Strikes Again

One of Jean Charles de Menezes' murderers has struck again - he shot dead a man in Kent on Tuesday.

This police officer is a dangerous killer but the public are unaware of his identity. The British media/government/legal system has afforded this murderer (and the others responsible for de Menezes' murder) anonymity.

He could be anywhere (the Met Police officer managed to commit this murder on a sleepy town on the south Kent coast). If you see him do not approach him and do not dial 999.

Will he get away with this murder? Will he be allowed to commit more murders? Is Glen Smythe a freemason?

The Prince & the Dictator

Charles von Oldenburg flew to Pakistan earlier this week to soothe Dictator Musharraf.

The dictator has been extremely upset with Britain ever since a senior British intelligence officer had stated some painful facts: the Pakistani military and intelligence agencies were responsible for creating the Taleban, they were still arming and funding the Taleban, and Osama Bin Laden was hiding out in a presidential palace in Islamabad.

The British government was very eager to make up for this slap in the face for a key ally in the "war on terror". So they came with the idea of sending Charles over to Pakistan, he had nothing better to do afterall.

Musharraf and Charles are very similar men. One became head of state at gun point and the other will, one day, become head of state by accident of birth. Yet both are appeased by the hypocrites who dare to call themselves "democrats".

New Tory, Old Story

The Tax Reform Commission’s proposals for changes to the British tax system clearly show that, though Comrade Cameron may claim that the New Conservatives care about public services, their primary objective is to help their friends by cutting taxes for the wealthiest in society.

The Commission’s proposals will result in personal and corporate tax cuts of up to £21bn. These cuts will have to be funded from either cuts in public expenditure, increases in other taxes or a mixture of both.

The Tories claim that they can raise the £21bn from green taxes. Green taxes are by nature regressive - they will have greater impact on the poor than on the rich. One example of a green tax is a road tax based on the fuel consumption of the vehicle. The rich, who can afford this green tax, will continue to drive their gas-guzzling SUV, MPV and 4X4. It is the poor, who can only afford older, less efficient vehicles, who will really face the pinch.

Most economists agree that green taxes can only raise a small amount of revenue. The Tories, even though they won’t admit it, will have to cut public services if they are going to deliver the cuts in personal and corporate taxes. They won’t make cuts to the glamourous public services, such as health and education, which are the darlings of the middle class. Instead, they will focus on the less glamourous public services, such as social security, social services and social housing, whose main beneficiaries are the poor.

The Tories claim that these tax cuts will help everyone, including the poor. However, the poorest in society pay little, if any, income tax. They do not pay inheritance tax because most do not own their homes and those who do own homes haven’t reached the threshold at which inheritance tax becomes payable, despite the vast increases in house prices. They will not receive the alleged benefits resulting from the cuts to corporate taxes because they, on the whole, do not own shares or have pensions.

The people who will benefit the most from these tax cuts are the Tories’ friends - the fat cats in the City and on company boards.

The tax cuts will achieve the prime goal of Conservatism. The gap between the rich and poor in society, which is already at its greatest since Victorian times, will be widened.

Madonna & Child

There are thousands of children in care in the UK awaiting adoption/fostering. There are even more in the USA. Yet Madonna flies all the way to Malawi to adopt a child.

Madonna and her supporters argue that she will give the child a life he would never receive in Malawi. She could give a British or American child this life but she doesn’t. Why?

Firstly, the latest celebrity craze is adopt a child from the developing world. This is as obscene as people from Essex wearing a “Fight Poverty” wristband. The suffering of billions of people has become a fashion statement. Secondly, in Malawi she can use her money to pick and choose the child, something she probably couldn’t do in the UK or USA.

The child in question may have lost his mother but he still has his father and many relatives, all of whom would make a better parent than an American pop star who could never have a full understanding of Malawian culture. The child will grow in a foreign culture, literally, constantly in the media’s gaze.

Madonna has bought-off the Malawian courts. Will she do the same to the British authorities?

Several of London’s finest were used to escort the child from Heathrow to Madonna’s plush home. On 21 January Peter Woodhams was stabbed near some shops in Canning Town, east London. Despite several telephone calls the police didn’t lift a finger. On 21 August he was shot dead outside the same shops. Clearly the level of public service you receive in Britain depends on your bank balance. It is merely a matter of formality before the British authorities rubber stamp this adoption.

The Sun - We Hate It

The vile Murdoch gutter press has once again been busy practising the dark arts of lies and half truths in order to promote their reactionary beliefs. They have managed to create an extraordinary storm from an unexceptional request.

A Met Police officer was excused from duties that may expose his family to reprisal. Nothing special about that. But this officer is a Muslim and his duty was to guard the Jewish embassy in London during the rape of Lebanon. The Wapping vermin must have thought it was their birthday - a chance to attack two of their biggest bete noires: Islam and political correctness.

The police officer in question has relatives in Lebanon and he feared that if, at the height of the rape of Lebanon, he was seen guarding the Jewish embassy they would attacked - by other Lebanese.

It is quite routine for police officers to be excused from duties that may expose their families to reprisal - they do not work in the area where they live. But you wouldn’t know that if you read today’s edition of the Murdoch gutter press. Never let the truth get in the way of brainwashing the mindless people who read your newspapers.

The Murdoch gutter press, and their subsidiary in the Police Federation, argue that no police officer should be able to pick and choose their duties. A few years ago, all the armed response officers in London threatened to withdraw their service if any legal or disciplinary action was taken against one of their own who had committed a murder. Did the Murdoch gutter press cry foul?

A Tale of Two Dictators

Dictator Nursultan Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan visited the US last week and was feted like the King of England by the neo-cons. Once again the blatant hypocrisy shown by the neo-con regime in Washington is unbelievable.

They rant and rave about bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq and Afghanistan and yet at the same time they give their wholehearted support to murderous tyrants like Dictator Nazarbayev.

Dictator Nazarbayev has ruled Kazakhstan like his own personal fiefdom for nearly two decades. He holds "elections" in which he and his party receive over 90% of the votes but these "elections" have been condemned as rigged and flawed by all neutral observers, including the OSCE. Opposition politicians have been imprisoned on trumped up charges or they have mysteriously "died" just before the elections.

Many of the companies privatised by Nazarbayev have ended up in the hands of his family who also run virtually every TV/radio station and newspaper in the country. Despite all this Dictator Nazarbayev has the US's full support.

Q) Why?

1) Could it be because Dictator Nazarbayev has allowed the US military to use Kazakhstan as a launch pad for it's rape of Afghanistan?
2) Could it be because Kazakhstan, sandwiched between Russia and China, provides the US with an important foothold in a strategically important part of the world?
3) Could it be because Kazakhstan contains vast reserves of oil and natural gas?

A) All of the above.

Meanwhile Dictator Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan was speaking at the Oxford Union. Has the world's leading academic institution abandoned democracy? No, this is simply a case of the wallet ruling the heart.

The Pakistani elite, who have profited under Dictator Musharraf's rule, love to send their sons and daughters to Oxford so that they can learn to speak posher than the von Saxe-Coburg Gotha's. The tuition fee they pay Oxford is many times that paid by British students. This buys them a great deal of influence. The Pakistani elite are using this influence to add one more badge of legitimacy to Dictator Musharraf's rule.

Hell on Earth

The UN has finally has confirmed what everyone outside Texas has known for a long time: life in "liberated" Iraq is worse than it was under Saddam Hussein's rule.

Iraq today is in anarchy - living there is sheer hell. Nearly 6,000 Iraqis have been murdered in the last two months alone. Torture is being used by all parties. On top of this, the economy is on its knees, most Iraqis do not have jobs. Most Iraqis do not have electricity, running water or sewerage. Fuel is scarce in the country with the second largest reserves of oil in the world.

Irrespective of who is responsible for the violence (the occupying forces, the quisling government, the collaborating militias or the resistance), it is the Iraqi people who suffer. And this will continue to be the case as long as Iraq is occupied.

From Budapest to Bangkok

Within the space of 24 hours there have been two attempts to remove corrupt governments. Neither has turned out as it should have.

The Hungarian people have tried unsuccessfully to remove the the incompetent, lying government of Ferenc Gyurcsany. The whole country wants the government to resign but Gyurcsany will not give in and has threatened to crack down on any further protests against his government.

It is quite astonishing that a "democratic" government should act in this manner. It is even more astonishing that the "international community", particularly other members of the EU, should remain silent as Gyurcsany steers Hungary back to the dark days of authoritarian rule.

In Thailand the army has staged a coup against the democratically elected government of Thaksin Shinawatra. The excuse used by supporters of the coup was that Thaksin was corrupt.

Thaksin has been corrupt most of his life. He didn't become a billionaire by being honest. He has been in power for five years and yet the army only moves against him now, shortly after he sacked the head of the army. This coup isn't about Thaksin's integrity - this coup is a result of the personal feud between Thaksin and the head of the army.

Once again the "international community" remains silent as Thailand returns to military dictatorship.

The "international community's" hypocrisy is quite unbelievable.

They were quite happy to support the popular revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine but remained silent as popular uprisings in Uzbekistan, Kyrgistan and now Hungary are brutally crushed.

They condemn authoritarian regimes in North Korea, Iran and Syria etc but are quite happy to support authoritarian military dictatorships in Pakistan, Libya and now Thailand.

Saddam Didn't Do It - Official

Who would have thought it. Iraq was not responsible for 9/11, there was never any link between the Saddam Hussein regime and Al-Qaeda.

What will Congress come up with next? Global warming is real?

The Spoils of War

I've been away a few days and it seems nothing has changed.

The Jewish terrorists are still in Lebanon and their swastika is still flying over Lebanese territory. The bombing may have stopped but the killing continues. The air and sea blockade imposed on Lebanon by the Jews means that food, medicine and fuel cannot get to Lebanon.

And there are hundreds of thousands of cluster bombs across Lebanon which the Jews, in one last act of evil, dropped on Lebanon in the last 72 hours running up to the cease fire. There's more than one way for the Jews to commit mass murder.

The much trumpeted UN resolution isn't worth the paper it is written on. The "international community'' is still dragging its feet in providing soldiers for the peace keeping force. Twenty Spanish soldiers arrived in Lebanon yesterday. The Jews must be scared shitless.

The Lebanese aren't the only ones suffering from a Jewish blockade. The blockade of Gaza has been going on for even longer but the "international community' seems to have forgotten about that.

Meanwhile, in Iraq, Saddam Hussein has gone on trial for the "Spoils of War' campaign in which hundreds of thousands of Kurds were murdered. Is Saddam guilty of this genocide? Yes. Will he go to the gallows? Yes. Will the people who provided Saddam with the weapons to commit these crimes face justice? No.

Back in the 1980's Saddam was a friend of America. He was waging a brutal war against Iran and, using the logic that "an enemy of my enemy is my friend", America provided him with billions of dollars of weapons.



Donald Rumsfeld, in a previous incarnation, actually flew to Baghdad, shook Saddam's hand and sold him American weapons. Weapons that Saddam promptly used to murder over one million Iranians/Kurds/Shias. Some of these weapons were probably used against Americans in 1991 and 2003.

Back in the UK a new term has entered the popular vocabulary - "Travelling Whilst Asian". There have already been a number of incidents when bigoted ignorant Sun readers have accused innocent travellers of being terrorists. The reasons for the false accusations include that they weren't wearing holiday clothing, they were speaking in Arabic or they were acting "suspiciously". Oh, and they were brown skinned.

British Intelligence (sic)

The British are masters in the art of overkill.

The travel plans of hundreds of thousands have been thrown in the air based on intelligence. This would be the same intelligence that said there were WMDs in Iraq, that didn't have a clue about the 7/7 bombers, that thought Jean Charles de Menezes was a terrorist and that sent in 500 police officers armed to their teeth into a two-up-two-down terraced house in the middle of the night based solely on the word of one individual.

The neo-con scum in Washington are making the most of this particular storm in a teacup, continuously stating that their country is "at war".

America's answer to the genuine grievances of Muslims is to bomb them into subjugation. What the neo-cons fail to comprehend is that as long as someone has no hope, nothing to lose, they will be prepared to do anything. Including hijacking planes, committing suicide and murdering hundreds.

Just how long will mothers have to taste their baby's milk before they board a plane in Britain? As long as there isn't a free Palestine, Chechnya and Kashmir and as long as the Americans prop-up murderous corrupt oppressive regimes in Afghanistan, Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan and most other Muslim countries.

One Thousand & Counting

As Lebanon burns the UN fiddles. After dragging it's feet for days it comes up with a draft resolution that could have been lifted straight from the Torah: the Jews stop offensive operations but Hezbollah must stop all attacks; Hezbollah must release the two Jewish soldiers immediately but there will only be talks about the fate of thousands of Lebanese held prisoner by the Jews without trial for decades.

Even if the UN passes a resolution on the rape of Lebanon, what are the chances of it enforcing it. The the chief Jewish propagandist, a graduate of the Joseph Goebbles School, was on Newsnight last week saying that Lebanon must enforce the UN resolution requiring it to disarm Hezbollah. The Jew nearly choked when Jeremy Paxman asked if the Jews will abide by UN resolutions requiring them to leave all the occupied territories. The gall of the BBC presenter to expect the Jews to abide by international law. The Jews are above international law.

1,000 Lebanese have now been murdered in this the latest reign of terror by the Jews. By the time the UN cobbles together a resolution the death toll will probably have reached 2,976.

The Qana Massacre

Over fifty women and children have been murdered by the cowardly Jews in Qana. As they hid in the basement of a house, terrified by the non-stop shelling and bombing above them, a "precision" bomb was fired on them by the Jews. Once again the Jewish Prime Minister expressed his "regrets". If a single Jew had died, let alone fifty, it would have been the end of the world as we know it. The murder of fifty innocent Lebanese is merely a matter of regret.

The Lebanese Prime Minister has finally got some backbone and told Condy where to go. I wonder how long this will last.

Tony Bliar is in California seeing how far he can get his head up Murdoch's arse. Bliar still won't condemn the Jews. Fifty odd Britons were killed on 7/7 and the Brits are still shedding tears over it. How many Lebanese have to be murdered before Bliar can pull himself free from Bush's leashes?

Qana is not the first massacre the Jews have carried out and got away with. And it won't be the last.

How Low, Can the Jews Go?

Just when you thought the Jews couldn't get any lower, they murder four UN observers.

One Jew is kidnapped and one million Palestinians are sent to hell. Two Jews are kidnapped and five million Lebanese are terrorised. Four unarmed UN observers are murdered and the Jewish Prime Minister expresses his "regrets".

The Jewish army is going to carry out an "investigation". Perhaps they can find an Arab conscript to blame.

What a monumental statement our beloved leaders have contorted in Rome. The Jews must be quaking in their Texas-made boots.

Grow Some Balls, Jan

The death toll in the Jewish reign of terror is now over 400 and just when you thought the Jews couldn't get any lower they bomb two Red Cross ambulances. Even the Nazis respected the neutrality of the Red Cross.

Don't be fooled by Condoleeza Rice's soothing words in Beirut. These are just to prop up the USA's lackey, the Lebanese Prime Minister. In private she supports wholeheartedly the Jew's aim of wiping Lebanon off the face of the Earth.

Saw Jan Egeland from the UN on the news yesterday critcising the Jewish air strikes on civilians. When a BBC journalist pressed him on whether this was a breach of international law Egeland backtracked, stating he didn't know what was between the civilian buildings. What has this got to do with it? Targetting civilians, even when they are next to military targets, is against international law.

Whenever the gutless wonders at the Arab League, EU or UN criticise the Jews they always temper this by stating that Hezbollah has to stop its air strikes on the Jews and that the Jews have a right to self defence. The Jews do not have a right to murder civilians, full stop. Everything else is irrelevant.

The Jews are war criminals. The USA is equally culpable in these war crimes because it is providing the Jews with the weapons, including phosphorous bombs. Will the corrupt self-serving mongrels who call themselves our leaders do anything about these war crimes? Perhaps when they get some balls they will.

The Rape of Lebanon

What a marvel 24 hour TV news is. For the past few days, I, like millions of others around the world, have been witnessing Lebanon being ripped to shreds by the Jews. To date over 350 civilians have been murdered, 1/2 million have been made refugees in their own country, thousands of homes have been destroyed and billions of pounds of damage has been inflicted on the country's infrastructure.

This is nothing less than Jewish terrorism.

But we shouldn't expect anything better from the Jews - they simply have no respect for the lives of non-Jews.

What is appalling is that the so called "international community" is allowing this to happen. Indeed, the neo-con axis of evil in Washington and London seem to be egging the Jews on.

Exasperated by this gross injustice, I have finally been forced to start my own blog.

This conflict is not about Lebanon. It is not even about eliminating the Hezbollah threat. This is about destroying the only two obstacles to US hegemony in the Middles East: Iran and Syria.

The USA is using its proxy in the Middle East to start a conflict that will be a precursor to the Jewish air force bombing Damascus and the non-existent Iranian nuclear programme. Not for the first time, nor the last, the Lebanese people are paying the price for someone else's quarrel.

The Jews have been preparing to attack Lebanon for many months. The kidnap of the two soldiers was just the excuse they needed.

The Jews have other excuses for their acts of evil. They claim Lebanon has not fulfilled it's part of a UN resolution requiring it to disarm Hezbollah. What about the dozens of other UN resolutions the Jews have ignored? If Lebanon disarms Hezbollah will the Jews withdraw to the 1948 borders, not just from the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights? Will they remove all the Jewish settlements from the territory they have occupied? Will they allow the millions of Arabs they ethnically cleansed from Palestine to return to their homes?

The Jews, as everyone knows, are immune from international law. They can, and they do do, whatever they like. And as long as they continue to pull the strings in Washington this is the way things are going to continue. Pity the people of Lebanon.